you're reading...
Financial Integrity, Football, Moral Integrity

Scottish Enterprise feared ‘reputational risk’ so hid their payment as Celtic pleaded poverty

Celtic ask for some public assistance for Lennoxtown

Celtic Board, not content with getting the funds back that they paid for Lennoxtown back via The Lennoxtown Initiative charity run Celtic Service Level Agreement (SLA) also held a gun at Scottish Enterprise Dunbartonshire’s (SED) head and threatened they would not proceed with Lennoxtown unless they got ‘some public sector assistance’. Scottish Enterprise folded and gave them £253,000 for abnormals which were nowhere to be found at settlement for Lennoxtown.

Like The Lennoxtown Initiative charity Celtic SLA hush-hush deal to return the Lennoxtown payment, the SED deal was agreed before Celtic bought Lennoxtown and it also would be hidden, also going through the charity’s Celtic SLA. Both deals were tee’d up for Celtic before settlement went through and they knew in advance they would receive those funds.

As stated previously any abnormals is normally subtracted from the land price sale. We saw Celtic achieve this with their friends, Glasgow Celtic Council (GCC), when they got a bargain 84% discount off the price of the Westthorn land. However when Lennoxtown was sold by NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde (NHSGGC) no abnormals were stated. But Celtic are claiming to SED that they’re there and if you don’t give us something extra we’re going in the huff.

Scottish Enterprise looks for justification but the cupboard was bare that year

From the SED Board paper presented at the 2nd March 2006 meeting the board item verifies that ‘Lennoxtown is not a strategic investment plan location’:

Fit With Strategy SED

So SED find another reason to justify the payment and found it under EU land remediation:

Powers under EU fundingAlthough SED doesn’t have enough funds that financial year 2006-07, they’ll find some in future years:

Funding Summary SED

Scottish Enterprise justified payment on the creation of new jobs

Again from SED Board item proposal:

Economic Impact SED

The Scottish Enterprise assumptions for justification above are laughable:

1. Celtic has undertaken to recruit people from the immediate area.

2. There is assumed to be a minimal level of leakage of jobs to people outside the local area.

Celtic must have had to bring the majority of staff from Barrowfield and some from Parkhead. Presumably they had existing ongoing contracts. Where any existing staff sacked to create ‘new’ jobs?

So how were Celtic going to fund an additional 34 NEW jobs when they felt they didn’t have enough money to build the bloody training centre in the first place?

OK I’ll give them that they need maybe more security guards – to keep out the locals – sorry wasn’t Lennoxtown supposed to be a ‘greenfield compatible’ site justified as a sporting complex with helping the local people become more healthy?

Was The Lennoxtown Initiative creatively trying to ‘find’ New jobs?

On 25th June 2008, in The Lennoxtown Initiative minutes for 25th June 2008 there’s the entry

Celtic contractual obligation to existing employees 2008 minutes

Were The Lennoxtown Initiative under pressure and asking Celtic to terminate staff they brought over from their prior training centre, Barrowfield, in order to look like they had created new staff positions to satisfy the terms of the grant given by the Scottish Enterprise?

Scottish Enterprise Board feared ‘reputational risks’ in subsidising Celtic

The Scottish Enterprise board minutes, on 2nd March 2006, to discuss funding part of Celtic’s Lennoxtown development lays out their fears that it will damage their reputation.

SED Board Approval worried about reputational risk to SE

Within the item proposal under Risk Assessment, both excerpts below show the extent that Scottish Enterprise were sensitive to the furore it would cause once knowledge of the payment came out. 

Risk Assessment Reputational SED

SED risk reputation

Question 1: Why, if everything was kosher & above board, did the Scottish Enterprise board fear reputational damage? Could it be that their exercise in estimating ‘new’ jobs was a paper exercise just to get approval?

Question 2: Was this why, rather than making a direct payment to Celtic, that the payment was hidden by making it indirectly via a 3rd party through a charity and as yet undocumented Celtic Service Level Agreement.

Question 3: Did Scottish Enterprise verify that the 34 NEW jobs eventuated and did they apologise to the Glasgow Celtic Council for all the jobs they stole from Barrowfield to justify their funding bump to Celtic? What really was the point of the funding when it’s almost a zero sum game moving jobs how many miles?

Poor Celtic?

Under the Funding section of the item proposal, Scottish Enterprise explain how the begging bowl came out: 

Celtic Funding Gap SED

So Celtic can afford to pay £8 million to develop the Lennoxtown training centre but they still held out the begging bowl to a public authority, Scottish Enterprise, that felt obliged to come to the party but hide the payment fearing for their reputation.

Why haven’t Celtic gone back to Scottish Enterprise to fund the road they were supposed to build instead of being bad neighbours and harassing locals with the increased traffic on the narrow roads near the training centre? Surely Scottish Enterprise can come to the party again?

Is this the Celtic board’s war cry when dealing with the Glasgow Celtic Council & Scottish Enterprise? Some of the board loves a bit of a sing song. It’s that old  ‘Ooh Ah’ song they’re always singing:

©footballtaxhavens.wordpress.com 2015  CC-by icon



4 thoughts on “Scottish Enterprise feared ‘reputational risk’ so hid their payment as Celtic pleaded poverty

  1. As blatantly corrupt an organisation as you will ever find (CFC), Tax avoidance through LLP where once again the appeal has been thrown out, scandalous abuse of public money via Glasgow Celtic Council and EDC/NHSGCC. I cannot fathom why the Scottish mhedia or press are completely ignoring any of this, it’s in black and white. Maybe Lawwell influence goes deeper than any of us really know.

    Posted by Steve Brindle | March 12, 2015, 4:08 pm

    Posted by AB6 | March 12, 2015, 6:44 pm
  3. Has this information been brought to the attention of government bodies? Have you raised this with MPs, MSPs or if you deem appropriate, Police Scotland? Have you taken legal advice on it? Assuming that you’ve attempted to bring this to the mainstream media’s attention and have been quietly dismissed, have you considered canvassing a UK body with this if you aren’t being acknowledged by Scottish ones? Even though you may be passed to the Scottish equivalent by a UK body, there would be a story for the UK media if this is repeatedly ignored by the Scottish media. Let’s face it, the media is supposed to act in the public’s interest and if this is not given sufficient coverage then that interest is not being adequately served. Also, presumably Audit Scotland would have an input into this at some juncture? Have you considered requesting information relating to the various public actors in the processes? Even FoI requests, repeated ones at that if necessary because if you are officially stonewalled in requesting information and especially if pertinent or sensitive information is redacted, then surely that would constitute a story in itself?

    Posted by Alex Wallace | March 18, 2015, 12:31 pm
  4. I’m totally gob smackd and utterly horrified. What makes it all worse is the lack of reporting and action from the press and authorities.

    On a positive note. This blog has been running for years now without legal challenge from Celtic FC or any of the other involved parties. That fact alone speaks massive volumes given the money and power at the disposal of the accused.

    Many sleepless nights ahead for these vile beings.

    Posted by Ron Ron | March 21, 2015, 4:36 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: